NEWTickerr MCP is live →
tickerr

Tickerr / Compare / Claude vs Gemini

Claude vs Gemini (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, usage limits and live uptime.

Verdict

Complex code generation

claude

Claude 3.7 consistently leads on coding benchmarks and multi-file refactors. It explains changes clearly and follows complex instructions.

Long document analysis

gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1 million token context window vs Claude's 200K — vastly better for large codebases or book-length documents.

Price for high volume

gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper per token than Claude Haiku for simple tasks, making it more economical at scale.

Live status

API pricing (per 1M tokens)

Claudefrom $0.250
Claude 3 Haiku
$0.250in
Claude Haiku 3.5
$0.800in
Claude Haiku 4.5
$0.800in
Claude Haiku 4.5
$0.800in
Claude 3.5 Haiku
$0.800in
Geminifrom $0.0400
Gemma 3 12B
$0.0400in
Gemma 3 4B
$0.0400in
Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.0600in
Gemma 3n 4B
$0.0600in
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
$0.0750in

Usage limits

Pro ($20/mo) vs Advanced ($19.99/mo)

LimitClaudeGemini
File Upload MB10 MB2048 MB

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude better than Gemini in 2026?

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads on reasoning and math benchmarks as of 2026. Claude 3.7 leads on code generation and instruction-following. For most users the quality difference is small — choose based on context window needs and price.

Which has a bigger context window, Claude or Gemini?

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1 million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4: 200K tokens. If you need to analyse very long documents, Gemini is the clear choice.

How do Claude and Gemini compare on price?

Both have similar mid-tier pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.075/1M input) is cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 ($0.25/1M input) for high-volume simple tasks.

Related comparisons

Individual tool pages