NEWTickerr MCP is live →
tickerr

Tickerr / Compare / Cerebras vs Groq

Cerebras vs Groq (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, usage limits and live uptime.

Verdict

Speed for large models

cerebras

Cerebras' wafer-scale chip delivers the fastest inference for large models like Llama 3.3 70B, exceeding Groq on some benchmarks.

Model variety

groq

Groq supports more models including Llama 4, Gemma, and Whisper. Cerebras has a smaller model catalogue.

Availability

groq

Groq is generally available. Cerebras has waitlist access for some models and regions.

Live status

API pricing (per 1M tokens)

Cerebrasfrom $0.100
Llama3.1.8b
$0.100in
Gpt Oss 120b
$0.350in
Qwen 3.32b
$0.400in
Llama3.1.70b
$0.600in
Llama 3.3.70b
$0.850in
Groqfrom $0.0000
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)
$0.0000in
Llama 3.1 8B (Groq)
$0.0000in
Gemma 7b It
$0.0500in
Llama 3.1 8B Instant
$0.0500in
Llama 3.1.8b Instant
$0.0500in

Frequently asked questions

Is Cerebras faster than Groq?

For large models (70B+), Cerebras' wafer-scale hardware can exceed Groq's speed. For smaller models, Groq is faster. Both are significantly faster than standard GPU inference.

What models does Cerebras support?

Cerebras supports Llama 3.1 8B, Llama 3.3 70B, Qwen3 235B, and other open models. The catalogue is smaller than Groq but growing.

How do Cerebras and Groq pricing compare?

Both are priced competitively. Cerebras is slightly more expensive for large model inference but offers faster tokens-per-second, which lowers cost-per-second-of-wait.

Related comparisons

Individual tool pages